tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5090933127365695771.post4035713224343367983..comments2024-01-17T19:32:13.920-08:00Comments on Prehistoric Beast of the Week: Tyrannosaurus: Beast of the WeekChris DiPiazzahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06732594604741735181noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5090933127365695771.post-39468062495461272902015-11-08T18:24:32.275-08:002015-11-08T18:24:32.275-08:00"Tyrannosaurs weren't sauropod hunters.&q..."Tyrannosaurs weren't sauropod hunters."<br /><br />They coexisted with Alamosaurus in parts of North America. I don't see why they wouldn't be given the opportunity. <br /><br />"and they were terrible at slicing flesh. A tyrannosaur bite is analagous to crushing a box and its contents but not actually cutting the box open."<br /><br />I don't think anything I wrote goes against this specifically. Although, as juveniles, Tyrannoaurus appear to have had slicing teeth.Chris DiPiazzahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06732594604741735181noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5090933127365695771.post-82937295878297967262015-11-08T16:29:26.590-08:002015-11-08T16:29:26.590-08:00Tyrannosaurs weren't sauropod hunters...and th...Tyrannosaurs weren't sauropod hunters...and they were terrible at slicing flesh. A tyrannosaur bite is analagous to crushing a box and its contents but not actually cutting the box open.BKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03759189747932749283noreply@blogger.com