|Corythosaurus casuarius life reconstruction, representing two males and a female.|
The crest of Corythosaurus, despite the name, wasn't really a helmet. (Although another group of dinosaurs, the pachycephalosaurs, did have skulls that served a purpose similar to that of helmets.) Its crest was circular-shaped, and hollow on the inside, housing a network of tubes that connected the animal's nostrils to its windpipe. Originally scientists thought this was an adaptation for a semi-aquatic lifestyle, but they were most likely for amplifying the sounds that Corythosaurus made. Corythosaurus could inhale through its nostrils, where the air would pass through the series of tubes before being released through the mouth, thus producing a louder sound, than if the tubes weren't present, much like the inner workings of trumpets or other brass wind instruments. Sound was probably a very important method of communication for Corythosaurus and its relatives. In fact, thanks to a beautifully preserved specimen of Corythosaurus, paleontologists were able to discover highly developed inner ear bone, further supporting this idea. The Corythosaurus genus used to consist of several species with similar crests of varying sizes. It was later realized, however, that these specimens were more likely different ages and sexes of the same species since they were all found in the same area together and the largest specimens had the largest crests. Since male and female Corythosaurus likely had different looking crests, they also probably had different sounding calls. We can see this today with their modern relatives, the birds and crocodilians, as well as other kinds of animals like frogs and insects. In the case of some of these animals the males are the only ones that call at all! That lovely chorus of crickets and frogs you hear at night? Those lovely bird songs you wake up to in the morning? Those are all horny dudes advertising their availability to potential mates. It is possible lambiosaurid dinosaurs practiced similar behaviors. Since several different kinds of these duckbills would have lived in the same place during the same time (Corythosaurus and Parasaurolophus, for instance.), it would make sense that each would have different crests to make different sounds and thus, preventing any identity confusion just like all the kinds of birds within a community each have their unique calls today.
|Corythosaurus skeleton, which includes patches of skin and other soft tissue, on display at the American Museum of Natural History in New York.|
Corythosaurus is amongst the most well-studied of the non-avian dinosaurs because one specimen that was unearthed in the early 1900s not only included nearly every single bone in the skeleton, but it also preserved skin, organs, and even the animal's last meal! Thanks to this individual, now on display at the American Museum of Natural History in New York,we know that Corythosaurus would have had pebbly, mosaic-like scales that varied in size to form patterns on its skin. It also had padding under its feet and hands, which scientists in the early 1900s originally thought would have been webbing for swimming, further supporting the false aquatic hypothesis. In the stomach cavity were the remains of conifer needles, sticks, and seeds. These plant foods would have been plucked with Corythosaurus' narrow, flat beak and chewed up with its hundreds of tiny teeth lining the back of its jaws.
That is all for this week! As always feel free to comment below or on our facebook page!
Barden, Holly. "Sexual dimorphism in dinosaurs: a review of the evidence and approaches" (PDF). APS 402 Dissertation. University of Sheffield. Retrieved 13 August 2013.
Bell, P. R. (2012). "Standardized Terminology and Potential Taxonomic Utility for Hadrosaurid Skin Impressions: A Case Study for Saurolophus from Canada and Mongolia". In Farke, Andrew A. PLoS ONE 7 (2): e31295. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031295. PMC 3272031. PMID 22319623
Dodson, P. (1975). "Taxonomic implications of relative growth in lambeosaurine dinosaurs". Systematic Zoology 24 (1): 37–54. doi:10.2307/2412696. JSTOR 2412696.